Tuesday, February 10, 2009

BC in the news: Mold keeps growing long after Ike left town MOORE (Beaumont Enterprise)

Beaumont Enterprise
Mold keeps growing long after Ike left town
By SARAH MOORE
February, 4, 2009

After Hurricane Ike tore through the Texas Gulf Coast on Sept. 13, millions of homes and businesses, many that had sustained some level of water damage, were left without power for days or even weeks.

The warm, damp conditions were perfect breeding grounds for an insidious invader: mold.

At a recent Hurricane Ike conference in Houston, Sara Speer Selber, an advocate for healthy, environmentally friendly building materials, asked a group of about 50 people how many had tested their homes for mold.

Very few raised their hands.

With a vast number of Gulf Coast residents are in some stage of the rebuilding process, many are thinking in terms of rebuilding "green."

But Selber, president of BuildClean, a nonprofit organization, said that's not enough.

They need to think "clean" and "geographically appropriate" as well.

Selber said that in her talks and seminars, she asks people to define "green."

"I have everybody list what does "green" mean," she said. "They use words like 'sustainable,' 'eco-friendly,' energy-efficient' and 'environmentally friendly.' I don't think I've every heard anyone say 'healthy."

Selber said a lot of emphasis is placed on sustainable and energy efficient materials and building practices while the importance of indoor air quality is virtually ignored.

Testing for mold is inexpensive and probably a good idea for anyone in the aftermath of a hurricane, Selber said.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, mold can cause symptoms ranging from mild allergic reactions such as nasal congestions, eye irritation, wheezing or skin irritation to severe reactions including fever and shortness of breath. Chronic lung disease sufferers might develop mold infections.

Children and those with weakened immune systems are most susceptible to mold-related maladies.

Mold is just one health risk that can be alleviated by using geographically appropriate materials, Selber said.

"If you are rebuilding, rebuild knowing that we live on the Gulf Coast," she said. "It's a humid environment subject to floods."

Rather than paper-based drywall and standard forms of insulation, think gypsum wall board and mold-barrier insulation.

The two things mold needs to thrive are a food source and a water source.

Wet paper-based drywall can provide both in abundance.

Selber said some mold remediation can be done by residents, with the proper guidance.

But experts are available as well.

Mark Hebert of BreatheEasy is a mold assessment consultant.

His company uses thermal imaging cameras to detect mold.

He said signs of a possible mold problem in a home or business are allergy symptoms such as sneezing, watery eyes, coughing and itchiness.

He said mold is rampant in Southeast Texas after Hurricane Ike, particularly in the areas affected by the storm surge.

"Bridge City is going to be the mold capital of the nation for the next five years," he said.

Hebert said an important part of mold remediation is properly drying out the building.

"It takes 12 days to dry out a house and people are doing it for four days," he said.

Another part of indoor air quality involves using materials that do not emit volatile organic compounds such as formaldehyde, Selber said.

"You can buy products that don't contain VOCs, such as VOC-free paint, carpet, insulation and it's really not that much more expensive," she added.

Selber also suggested that for people in the process of rebuilding, this is an ideal time to test for other substances like radon, asbestos and lead.

LINK: http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news/local/mold_keeps_growing_long_after_ike_left_town_02-09-2009.html

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

From Our Friends at the Indoor Air Quality Resource Center

News Release

From: Air Quality Sciences

For Immediate Release

Contact:
Allison Laney
(770) 933-0638
alaney@aqs.com
or
Tony Worthan
(770) 933-0638
tworthan@aqs.com

Protecting Indoor Air Quality Required as Homes Go Green

ATLANTA, January 14, 2009 - Just like an old neighborhood as it gentrifies, so the residential construction industry is undergoing a significant shift from old ways of building to new sustainable (green) practices. With this change, comes a requirement to insure healthy indoor air for those inside, while protecting the natural resources of our planet outside. Architects, homebuilders and contractors are learning that a homeowners' right for non-toxic, healthy indoor environments ranks right up there with energy and environmental conservation.

Results of a recent survey conducted by the National Home Builders Association (NAHB) and McGraw-Hill bear this out in terms of market share and homeowner attitudes. For example, the US residential green building market is expected to double to 12% to 20% ($40 billion to $70 billion) market share by 2012. The survey results also showed that 70% of homebuyers were more apt to buy green even in today's economic conditions, and 87% were at least moderately knowledgeable about green home construction. Homeowners cited lower operating costs through energy savings (91%), having a healthier place to live (84%) and environmental concerns (80%) as the top three most important reasons for buying green homes.

Yet, according to the survey results, which were reported in the McGraw-Hill Construction 2008 SmartMarket Reports, builders still tend to focus more on energy and environmental conservation in their selection of green features, such as tight construction, insulation, Energy Star® products and water-efficient plumbing. While these features are excellent choices for lowering energy costs and conserving water, they may inadvertently contribute to poor indoor air quality (IAQ).

"As with commercial buildings, super tight, insulated homes with minimal ventilation and low air change rates can result in indoor mold growth and indoor air pollutants building up to levels that threaten occupant health. Conversely, pursuing good IAQ without considering the efficient use of energy may unnecessarily increase construction and energy costs, create financial hardships for families, and increase emissions of greenhouse gases, thereby contributing to outdoor air pollution" said Tony Worthan, President of Air Quality Sciences, Inc. (AQS).

A new white paper from AQS, titled Energy Conservation and Indoor Air Quality: Benefits of Achieving Both in Homes, explains the importance of balancing the efficient use of energy with good indoor air quality. It also emphasizes that all those involved in building and renovating homes must strive towards adopting one defining common set of green principles that place equal emphasis on energy efficiency and protecting occupant health (good IAQ). The two must go together. In addition, this white paper reviews who is most at risk from indoor air pollution, common indoor air contaminants found in homes, their sources, health impacts and what steps can be taken to achieve efficient use of energy and good IAQ.

This white paper completes a three-part series on energy and indoor air quality. The other two papers in the series, Energy Conservation and Indoor Air Quality: Partnering to Protect Human Health, and Energy Conservation and Indoor Air Quality: Lessons From the Past Have Relevance for the Future, are recommended reading to gain a valuable perspective on the interdependence of IAQ and energy conservation and the benefits of considering them as primary and complementary goals for healthy indoor environments. All three white papers are available free of charge from the Aerias-AQS Indoor Air Quality Resource Center at www.aerias.org, Premium Content tab / White Papers.

Monday, February 2, 2009

Hostile Granite Showrooms Refuse to Discuss Radiation

Green Building Elements
Hostile Granite Showrooms Refuse to Discuss Radiation
Written by Linda Kincaid, MPH, CIH
Published on February 2nd, 2009
Posted in Interior Materials


Erica Marcus declared, “I was basically thrown out of a showroom today for mentioning radiation to the owner”. “This tells a lot about the industry knowing about what they are selling.”

Erica and her husband are shopping for granite countertops, and Erica is asking questions about radiation. They are both “serious cooks”, and they have two young children. They do not want any chance of increased radiation in their kitchen, but Erica found that granite showrooms do not welcome her questions.

A San Francisco showroom asked Erin to leave. A South San Francisco showroom initially welcomed her questions, but the tone quickly became uncomfortable.
“Welcome, let’s talk about your concerns, but when the conversation got technical and she realized I knew more than the average customer, she pulled me off the floor and into her cubicle/office. She…admitted there would be a few stones that would register on their meter and they were for sale with nothing posted about the potential danger…” “she didn’t know the difference between radiation and radon”

Cathy Woods relayed similar experiences a few months earlier. The same South San Francisco showroom told her, “It is the customer’s responsibility to know about what they buy”. A showroom in Hayward, CA told Cathy that none of their granite was more radioactive that soil or water. Some of the most radioactive granite we have found was in that Hayward showroom.

My own experiences are not unlike those of Erica and Cathy. A San Jose, CA showroom manager told me last August, “This is all propaganda from Silestone”. When I showed him radioactive Niagara Gold granite in his showroom, he insisted, “a sealer will take care of it”. As few minutes later, an assistant asked me to leave the premises.

I was back in that San Jose showroom a few months later, scanning granite for a client. The showroom staff kept me waiting nearly two hours. First, they said they had no record of the client. Then they said they could not find his granite. The manager was quite rude and seemed to prefer losing a customer, rather than allow an industrial hygienist to scan his granite.

A different showroom in Hayward, CA flatly refused to let me scan granite for a client at their site. The manager told the client, “You are not bringing your science device in here”. The client transported his slabs to the fabricator, where I conducted the scan. Two of his three slabs were more radioactive than he wanted.

I have scanned about 1000 slabs of granite since last July, when the NY Times published an article on radioactive granite. Most of those slabs emitted very little radiation. However, a small percentage emitted gamma radiation at many times background. Some of those stones contained as much uranium as uranium ore. Given a choice, most homeowners would not opt for uranium ore in their kitchens. Many granite showrooms do not give their customers the option of making that choice.

LINK: http://greenbuildingelements.com/2009/02/02/hostile-granite-showrooms-refuse-to-discuss-radiation/

Hostile Granite Showrooms Refuse to Discuss Radiation

Green Building Elements
Hostile Granite Showrooms Refuse to Discuss Radiation
Written by Linda Kincaid, MPH, CIH
Published on February 2nd, 2009
Posted in Interior Materials


Erica Marcus declared, “I was basically thrown out of a showroom today for mentioning radiation to the owner”. “This tells a lot about the industry knowing about what they are selling.”

Erica and her husband are shopping for granite countertops, and Erica is asking questions about radiation. They are both “serious cooks”, and they have two young children. They do not want any chance of increased radiation in their kitchen, but Erica found that granite showrooms do not welcome her questions.

A San Francisco showroom asked Erin to leave. A South San Francisco showroom initially welcomed her questions, but the tone quickly became uncomfortable.
“Welcome, let’s talk about your concerns, but when the conversation got technical and she realized I knew more than the average customer, she pulled me off the floor and into her cubicle/office. She…admitted there would be a few stones that would register on their meter and they were for sale with nothing posted about the potential danger…” “she didn’t know the difference between radiation and radon”

Cathy Woods relayed similar experiences a few months earlier. The same South San Francisco showroom told her, “It is the customer’s responsibility to know about what they buy”. A showroom in Hayward, CA told Cathy that none of their granite was more radioactive that soil or water. Some of the most radioactive granite we have found was in that Hayward showroom.

My own experiences are not unlike those of Erica and Cathy. A San Jose, CA showroom manager told me last August, “This is all propaganda from Silestone”. When I showed him radioactive Niagara Gold granite in his showroom, he insisted, “a sealer will take care of it”. As few minutes later, an assistant asked me to leave the premises.

I was back in that San Jose showroom a few months later, scanning granite for a client. The showroom staff kept me waiting nearly two hours. First, they said they had no record of the client. Then they said they could not find his granite. The manager was quite rude and seemed to prefer losing a customer, rather than allow an industrial hygienist to scan his granite.

A different showroom in Hayward, CA flatly refused to let me scan granite for a client at their site. The manager told the client, “You are not bringing your science device in here”. The client transported his slabs to the fabricator, where I conducted the scan. Two of his three slabs were more radioactive than he wanted.

I have scanned about 1000 slabs of granite since last July, when the NY Times published an article on radioactive granite. Most of those slabs emitted very little radiation. However, a small percentage emitted gamma radiation at many times background. Some of those stones contained as much uranium as uranium ore. Given a choice, most homeowners would not opt for uranium ore in their kitchens. Many granite showrooms do not give their customers the option of making that choice.

LINK: http://greenbuildingelements.com/2009/02/02/hostile-granite-showrooms-refuse-to-discuss-radiation/

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

New National Center for Healthy Housing Report

The National Center for Healthy Housing (NCHH) announced Jan. 12: "[That the NCHH] and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently completed the first U.S. scientific review of healthy homes interventions. The results are available in a new report titled Housing Interventions and Health: A Review of the Evidence." Check out the report on the NCHH website: http://www.centerforhealthyhousing.org/.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

National Radon Action Month

BuildClean’s National Radon Action Month Message: Test, Test, Test Your Home for Indoor Radon Sources No Matter Where You Live in the U.S.

HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Consumer advocacy organization BuildClean today warned that cancer-causing radon may emanate from indoor building materials. “The only way to know for sure is to test your home,” says Sara Speer Selber, president of BuildClean.

“Certain industries, building materials manufacturers and resellers would have consumers believe there is absolutely nothing to worry about when it comes to the potential for surface choices such as granite, concrete or ceramic tile to contribute to indoor radon exposure,” said Speer Selber.

“Their motivation is obvious, but a growing body of evidence indicates that some very popular materials may, in some instances, emit not only radon but gamma radiation. The only way to know is to test the materials in your home environment — or better yet — before installing them,” she added.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), radon exposure is the second-leading cause of lung cancer in the country. Until recently, Speer Selber says, consumer radon exposure was thought to be confined to certain areas of the U.S. where it is commonly found in soil or rock—a source better known as “environmental radon.”

The EPA suggests that radon measurements between 2 to 4 picocuries per liter (pci/L) — should be considered for mitigation to reduce health risks. Radon results from the decay of uranium in soil or rock over time.

“We have seen tests conducted by laboratory scientists and certified technicians indicating radon measurements greater than 4 pci/L from common building materials,” said Speer Selber. “While direct exposure to radon can be mitigated by increasing air circulation in affected areas, our concern — and our message to consumers — is that adding any source to your home with the potential to injure health inside your home is a bad idea,” she added.

January is National Radon Action Month. The EPA (http://www.epa.gov/radon/nram) targets this month to provide information and educational resources to the public to help consumers learn more about radon—where it comes from, how it affects health and how to know if your family may be unnecessarily exposed.

“Hardware stores, big-box home improvement outlets and the internet are great places to find inexpensive (about $25-$50) do-it-yourself radon test kits,” said Speer Selber. “Although not perfect, home testing is a great way to find out if you should invest in a professional evaluation by a certified technician.”

More information about radon, gamma radiation and other sources of indoor health risks is available at www.buildclean.org or by emailing info@buildlcean.org.

ABOUT BUILDCLEAN™

Founded in 2007, Houston-based BuildClean is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization that educates consumers and the building industry about safe, healthy and environmentally friendly materials. The organization supports evidence-based research to determine, identify and communicate the benefits and/or risks associated with indoor materials. BuildClean President Sara Speer Selber is an award-winning activist on health-related issues.

Contacts

BuildClean
Jenny Vacca, 832-866-3451
jennyvacca@20kgroup.com

20K Group LLC

Friday, December 5, 2008

Mold Stories from the Real World--Part I

Check this out---http://www.homeaire.com/blog/mold/mold-in-the-home.php

Radon Stories from the Real World--Part I

Yesterday, I watched granite countertops removed from a friend’s kitchen. The granite emitted gamma radiation and radon gas. A simple screening test could have identified the granite as inappropriate, and would have saved Cathy many thousands of dollars and untold hours of worry. However, the importer chose not to test, rather telling customers their granite “is no more radioactive than soil or water”.

Cathy chose granite for her kitchen for the beauty of the stone, and because she wanted a natural, “safe” work surface. She learned just weeks after installation that some granite can be radioactive. She enlisted the services of numerous professionals to assess her granite and her exposure to radiation and radon. The answers always came back the same. Her granite was not as “hot” as some granite on the market, but it undeniably emitted gamma radiation at many times background. Her granite also increased the radon concentration in her home.

A few weeks ago, Cathy chose alternate granite that is not radioactive. It is a beautiful stone, and more important, she will again feel comfortable working in her kitchen and spending time there as she has done over the years. However, she will not forget that she could have been spared the anguish of the past few months if the importer had tested their granite prior to placing it in their showroom.
--L. Kincaid, Industrial Hygienist

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Check out Women and Environment.Org's website NOW

This report is NOT to be missed: http://www.womenandenvironment.org/pdf/2008_report_card.pdf
Check it out and see what's been very good and what's been very, very bad.....

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Sara and Ashli: Back from Greenbuild 2008

Sara: It seems LEED will now be almost 90% concerned with energy efficiency and water utilization, which makes sense if we consider global warming and the shortage of water the world may face. However, we spend at least half, if not more, of our time indoors, so it's just logical that materials we use indoors should be chosen just as carefully for their health impacts. Preserving water resources and cleaning up outdoor air is indeed critical; but so is understanding how indoor materials and cleaning substances may cause or aggravate chronic illnesses.

We saw a lot of products at the show claiming to be "Green" label, but as I read labels, I began to conclude that the only real change in those products was branding. For example, a product may be typed as "low-VOC" (volatile organic compound), but I heard a speaker who was presenting on the new LEED standards, say NO LEVEL OF VOC is safe in a sealed-up, energy-efficient environment.

30,000 people attended Greenbuild conference, and, from conversations I had with a lot of them, it seemed that many attendees were very new to the industry. What that says to me is that GREEN is todays' norm; it's how we will be building routinely. Now, let's focus on healthy indoor environments!

Ashli: What a great conference for BuildClean. I staffed our booth, and I met builders, architects, media, students, teachers, heads of other non-profits, and the list goes on--all of whom were very excited about what BuildClean is about and how we are recognizing what the "green" world is overlooking. Our broad message about all indoor air quality issues was very well received, and I'm excited about 2009 becoming the year that healthy and green become synonomous.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

BuildClean at Greenbuild 2008!

BuildClean is hanging out at Greenbuild 2008 in Boston this week. Check back with us next week for Sara's and Ashli's impressions of one of the biggest green expos in the world!

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

BuildClean™ Asks Expert to Explain Link Between Granite and Radiation

Granite & Radiation

Linda Kincaid, MPH, CIH
Industrial Hygiene Services

Note to reader: The full text of this article is available at www.buildclean.org.


When the issue of granite and radiation became widely discussed, our company chose to conduct our own investigation. Over the course of the past few months, we have surveyed approximately 750 slabs of granite in slab yards and several dozen granites installed in homes. We are comfortable in saying that most granite that is available for sale is not excessively radioactive. However, we have encountered a number of slabs that emit gamma radiation at 25 – 50 times background radiation. One slab emitted gamma radiation at over 100 times background.

The radiation comes from numerous isotopes in the uranium-238 decay chain, the thorium-232 decay chain, and the potassium-40 decay chain. Typical granite contains very little uranium or thorium. However, some granite that has been installed in homes contains enough uranium to be considered uranium ore.

The US currently has no standards for radiation in building materials. Given the lack of a domestic guidance document, we refer to the standard produced by the European Community (http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/publication/doc/112_en.pdf). Unfortunately, application of the EC standard requires laboratory analysis of the material. Lab tests are expensive, can take several weeks, and require destruction of a portion of the material.

Our company saw the need for a simple field survey that would screen granite for excessive radiation. As Certified Industrial Hygienists, we routinely address complex exposure assessment questions. We applied our skills to devising a simple methodology for testing granite for radiation. We focus our testing on gamma radiation, because gamma is the most harmful of the forms of radiation emitted by granite.

Our primary field tools are a Geiger counter (shielded to block alpha and beta radiation) and a PM1703 sodium iodide scintillator that detects gamma emissions only. We also utilize Arrow-Tech gamma dosimeters from time to time. We take our readings on the surface of the granite in order to simulate the worst-case exposure. We feel this approach is justified in that contact with granite is not uncommon. Homeowners lean against and sit on top of their counters. One homemaker anticipated spending 4-5 hours a day seated at her granite table.

In most cases, scanning representative areas of the granite will indicate that the stone is only slightly more radioactive than soil or other common materials. However, we occasionally find granites that emit gamma radiation at many times background. In one case, we sent a sample of granite to a lab for gamma spectroscopy. That granite was determined to be over twice as radioactive as would be acceptable under the European standard, and the stone contained more uranium than many uranium ores.

We are often asked to predict which granites are more likely to be excessively radioactive. After scanning many hundreds of granites, there are certain colors that are more likely to get my attention. However, there is variability among all colors. Testing is the only way to be certain how much radiation is emitted by a particular granite.